An exploratory case study: In search of key enabling factors for effective participatory design for socio-technical innovation

DossierMV.KIEM.01.150
StatusLopend
Subsidie€ 40.000
Startdatum1 februari 2025
Einddatum28 februari 2026
RegelingKIEM Maatschappelijk Verdienvermogen (MV) 2024-2026
Thema's
  • Kunst en de creatieve industrie
  • Sleuteltechnologieën en duurzame materialen
  • Bètatechniek
  • Maatschappelijk verdienvermogen 20-23

The pace of technology advancements continues to accelerate, and impacts the nature of systems solutions along with significant effects on involved stakeholders and society. Design and engineering practices with tools and perspectives, need therefore to evolve in accordance to the developments that complex, sociotechnical innovation challenges pose. There is a need for engineers and designers that can utilize fitting methods and tools to fulfill the role of a changemaker. Recognized successful practices include interdisciplinary methods that allow for effective and better contextualized participatory design approaches. However, preliminary research identified challenges in understanding what makes a specific method effective and successfully contextualized in practice, and what key competences are needed for involved designers and engineers to understand and adopt these interdisciplinary methods.
In this proposal, case study research is proposed with practitioners to gain insight into what are the key enabling factors for effective interdisciplinary participatory design methods and tools in the specific context of sociotechnical innovation. The involved companies are operating at the intersection between design, technology and societal impact, employing experts who can be considered changemakers, since they are in the lead of creative processes that bring together diverse groups of stakeholders in the process of sociotechnical innovation. A methodology will be developed to capture best practices and understand what makes the deployed methods effective. This methodology and a set of design guidelines for effective interdisciplinary participatory design will be delivered. In turn this will serve as a starting point for a larger design science research project, in which an educational toolkit for effective participatory design for socio-technical innovation will be designed.

Eindrapportage

As technology continues to accelerate and reshape complex sociotechnical challenges, design and engineering practices need to evolve accordingly. This project investigated what makes interdisciplinary participatory design methods effective in practice. The project focused on the key enabling factors that allow designers and engineers to act as changemakers in sociotechnical innovation contexts.

To answer this question, a literature review was combined with focus group sessions and case study research across three real-life design practice cases at two companies experienced with participatory design for sociotechnical innovation. Design sessions were observed, surveys were conducted with involved actors, and situational analysis was applied to capture what actually happens in practice and cross-compare findings across the three cases.

This process resulted in the identification of 50+ enabling factors, structured into eight clusters that form the foundation of a reflective framework for participatory design. Three of these clusters appeared consistently across all cases, though often working through different mechanisms. Key enablers with the strongest influence on effectiveness include the diversity of participant roles and backgrounds, domain-specific knowledge of both participants and facilitators, a formalized session structure with planned checkpoints, active adaptation by the facilitator, and the role of boundary objects. Specifically the use of boundary objects was more influential than initially hypothesized. The influence of a shared vocabulary and contextualization was less prominent than expected.

What became clear is that effective participatory design is not just about methods or tools, but about how structure, facilitation, knowledge, and group dynamics come together in a specific context. The resulting framework offers designers and facilitators a shared frame of reference to reflect on their own practice and make more informed choices in future projects.

Next steps include a relational analysis of the most influential enabler clusters and documenting the research in a publication.

Contactinformatie

Fontys Hogeschool

Jeroen Keijzers, contactpersoon

Consortiumpartners

bij aanvang project